of
valuation models and methods, and proposed the issue of uniqueness of business valuation model in accordance with the
basic principles of business. The author proposed BEIZHAN MODEL which can be used as the only one business valuation
model based on the universal rules of business.
1. Current Business Valuation Models
1.1 Definition of Business Valuation
Business Valuation is a kind business
behavior practiced by business valuation professionals to assess the value of
the whole or part of a business according to certain business valuation model
and to determine the price of the business.
1.2 Status and Role of Business Valuation
Business valuation is the foundation of
business as a special commodity to trade and exchange. Business valuation
is a mandatory work for business development, business integration, business
exchange and a business transition. Business valuation is also a means for
business operators and owners to conduct comprehensive self-evaluation on the
performance of the operated business. Business valuation is also a necessary
condition to implement value management on the business.
1.3 Definition of Business Valuation Model [3]
Business valuation model should be defined as the set of the contents to be valued, the valuation scope and the valuation methods
applied.
1.4 Definition of Business Valuation Method
Business valuation method should be defined as the
method to calculate the value of
a certain level of the assessed business.
1.5 Relationship
between Business Valuation Model and
Valuation Method
Business valuation model should be unified and
unique; business
valuation methods for different levels of a
business can be different; that
is to say that business valuation model
can contain multiple different valuation methods. The valuation method regarding the same
level of business shall be the same as most as possible. In
case of rationality accepted by
all, the valuation methods for the same level of
businesses can be different; such as the variation of valuation
methods caused by the industry difference; the variation methods caused by
profit growth property, etc. The compatibility of different valuation methods
for the same business level can be developed and improved according to the business valuation framework.
1.6 Current Business Valuation Models and Methods
In speaking of current situation, business
valuation is fulfilled with different business valuation models [1].
Current business valuation models mainly are the followings:
1.6.1 Asset(or cost) based approach
method
1.6.2 Market-based approach method
1.6.3 Income-based approach method
1.6.4 Venture capital approach method
2. The Uniqueness of Business Valuation
Model
2.1 Basic Principle of Business
Transaction
The basic principle of business
transaction is that same value goods can be exchanged. Based on this
principle, I think that business valuation model should only be one, which is
the uniqueness of business valuation model.
2.2 Uniqueness of Business Valuation
Model
The uniqueness of business valuation
model means all business valuation shall apply the same business valuation
model. Then we can ensure the comparability of valuation results; we can
ensure the fairness of the business transactions. The valuation results brought
by different valuation models can not be compared.
Valuation Model
determines the comparability
of business, ensures the fairness
of business transactions. It’s like to determine
the weight of an object, the standard of weights and measures shall be unified,
different units of measurement should have only one conversion standard.
Therefore, determination of a unified unique business valuation model for the
transaction of business (equity trading), this particular commodity, has a very
important significance. Significance of
the Unification of business valuation model is equivalent to the significance of the unification of weights and measures standard.
Valuation Model
Drawbacks of Current Business Valuation Models
Current business valuation models all have the
significance of partial business valuation all have limitations, can not
fully reflect the full value of the valued business. Using P / E values to determine the terminal value of a business is subjective, has no basis, the possible
deviation which may be brought is a multiplying result and is unacceptable. Weighted approach to multiple business
valuation results based on different valuation model is subjective and has no basis, so it is unscientific and therefore is
unacceptable.
3.2. The Foundation for the Uniqueness
of Business Valuation Model
by the commonality of business itself, which
is the internal basis of the uniqueness of the business valuation model. The
external foundation of the uniqueness of business valuation model includes
general rules and common requirements of business.
3.2.1 The Commonality of
Business
Presently owning certain technologies, facilities,
financial resources and human resources (current
resource characteristics)
Presently owning certain profits (current profit characteristics)
May have stable profit or growing profit (profit growth characteristics)
May have stable business or expanding business (resource expansion characteristics)
General Rules of Business
Comparability: Business transaction requires that goods
with same value can be compared
Fairness: Business transaction requires that the
exchange of goods is fair
Universality: comparability and fairness of business
transactions shall be applied to any business
3.2.3 The Common Requirements of Business
The Unity of Business Valuation Model
No business in the world can be said that it can not be valued, the perfect
business can be valuated, the non-perfect business can also be valued with the
same business valuation model. This is the unity of business valuation model.
The Popularity of Business Valuation Model
Business valuation model shall not be inscrutable metaphysics or high-energy
physics, business is well known, and therefore, business valuation model shall
also be easy to be understood by the public, this is the popularity of business
valuation model.
3.3. Beizhan Model
Based on the external foundation of business valuation model, according to the
internal foundation of business valuation model, establishing the united and
unique business valuation model is possible. Standing on this, I would like to
propose the fact plus growth valuation model, that is the Beizhan Model.
3.3.1 Fact plus Growth Valuation Model
Fact plus growth valuation model consists two parts, the fact part is the valuation on the current resource characteristics and current profit characteristics of a business, the growth part is the valuation on the profit growth characteristics and resource expansion characteristics of a
business.
The valuation of the fact part is relatively easy to understand, and it is
possible to get relatively more objective valuation result. Many current
business valuation models belong to this kind valuation, such as: assets (or
cost) based approach method, income-based approach method, and so on.
The valuation of the
growth part is relatively not easy to understand or acceptable. However, profit
growth and resource expansion are the essence of business, which is not
difficult to understand. Of course, the profit growth characteristics and
resource expansion characteristics of each business are different. There are
three main growth types here, one is parallel
growth; one is curve growth; one
is curve shrink (negative growth).
Curve growth may contain the case of geometric
curve growth. For example: the growth of the discrete business of catering,
retail and other businesses belong to parallel growth type; the growth of chain
store business belongs to curve growth type; and the
growth of some internet
companies at some stages belongs to geometric curve growth type; the growth of some uncompetitive companies at some stages belongs to
curve shrink type.
Some people will
definitely say, the valuation of growth part of a business is difficult to be
determined objectively. It is not in reality. The growth part of a business is
firstly determined by the fact part of the business (Namely current resource
characteristics and profit characteristics). Secondly, the growth part of a
business is determined by the prospect and competition form of the market it
belongs to. These factors can make the valuation of the growth part of a
business to be more objective. Competitive position of the business is also a
factor in its growth in part to assess the impact. The competition position of
a business in the belonged market is a key factor to influence the valuation of
the growth part of that business. The competition position of the business is a
kind resource characteristic of the business.
universal significance, shall be a more objective business valuation model.
Because this business valuation model is based on the internal foundation of
the uniqueness of business valuation model, and therefore, it shall be only one
business valuation model.
3.3.2 Fact Part Valuation
valuation of current profits. It is a chromatogram of a business in the cross
section on time.
Current Resource Valuation
value.
Core Value
The valuation of core
value consists of valuation of intangible
assets and tangible assets mainly, such as: brand resources, technology
resources, product type product resources, service type product resources, customer
resources, and so on. Traditional asset or cost valuation method can be applied
to such kind valuation.
3.3.2.1.2 Packaging Value
The valuation of
packaging value contains the valuation of market resources of a business, such
as: market competition position of the business, marketing forms of the
business, products or services, and so on. The valuation of this part needs to
be gradually developed and improved based on business valuation framework.
3.3.2.1.3. Strength Value [2]
The valuation of the strength
value contains the
valuation of the operation resources of a business, such as: business partners,
business alliances, business sponsors, business supporters, business documents,
business relationships, and so on. The valuation of this part also needs to be
gradually developed and improved based on business valuation framework.
3.3.2.2. Current Profit Valuation
Current profit valuation
mainly focuses on the current profit of a business. The traditional income
based method can be applied to such kind valuation.
3.3.3. Growth Part Valuation
Growth part valuation can
be divided into two parts: resource
expansion valuation and profit growth valuation. It is a chromatogram of a
business in the cross section on time after a
certain expected developing period. According to current common
practice, the expected developing period generally is five years. In my view, this is expected chromatogram and the
chromatogram of the fact part is somewhat different, especially in the aspect
of resource expansion characteristics.
3.3.3.1. Resource Expansion Valuation
Resource expansion
valuation shall be based on the certainty
of resources, because it is after all a forecast for the future. In my
view, the valuation of resource expansion shall mainly include the intangible asset part in the core value, such as: brand
resources, customer resources, technology resources, and so on. Tangible asset
resources, the expansion of packaging value and strength values are uncertain, under the principle of equality and fairness, they can be out of
consideration. The valuation of this part can also be gradually developed and
improved based on business valuation framework. The traditional intangible
asset valuation method all can be applied to such kind valuation.
3.3.3.2. Profit Growth Valuation
Profit growth valuation
mainly focused on the profit status in the expected developing period of a
business. The traditional method can be used to assess the income of such
assessments.
4. Summary
The
unique of business valuation model is determined by the inherent nature
characteristics of business, the fact plus growth business valuation model (Beizhan Model) I have proposed reflects the inherent
nature of the business, meets the
external needs of
business, and therefore it can be
used as the sole business
valuation model. I also very welcome further discussion on this model from the industry
insiders.
现有的商业评估模式
商业评估的定义
商业评估的地位与作用
商业评估模式的定义[3]
商业评估方法的定义
商业评估模式和评估方法的关系
现有的商业评估模式和方法
基于资产(或成本)的方法
基于市场的方法
基于收入的方法
风险投资方法
商业评估模式的唯一性
商业交易的基本原则
商业评估模式的唯一性
商业评估模式唯一性的意义
备战评估模式
现有商业评估模式的弊端
商业评估模式唯一性的基础
商业的共同特征
现实拥有一定的技术,设施,财力和人力资源(现实资源特征)
现实可能拥有一定的盈利(现实盈利特征)
可能具有稳定的盈利或增长的盈利(盈利增长特征)
可能具有稳定的业务或扩张的业务(资源扩张特征)
商业的普遍规则
可比性:商业交易要求同值商品是可以相比较的
公平性:商业交易要求商品的交换是公平的
普遍性:商业交易的可比性和公平性应当是适用于任何商业的
商业的共同需求
商业评估模式的统一性
商业评估模式的通俗性
这就是商业评估模式的通俗性。
备战模式
基于此,我提出事实加增长评估模式,即备战模式。
事实加增长评估模式
这里主要有三种增长类型,一种是平行增长,一种是曲线增长,一种是曲线萎缩(负增长)。 曲线增长中可能会包含几何曲线增长的情形。例如:离散的饮食,零售店等商业的增长就属于平行增长类型;连锁店商业的增长就属于曲线增长类型;而某些互联网企业在某些阶段就属于几何曲线增长类型;某些缺乏竞争力企业在某些阶段就属于曲线萎缩类型。
事实部分的评估
现实资源的评估
现实盈利的评估
增长部分的评估
资源扩张的评估
盈利增长的评估
Clinton Lee, <<Ultimate Website Valuation Guide>>, July 29, 2008 http://www.sitepoint.com/web-site-valuation-guide/
http://www.valuadder.com/glossary/business-valuation-model.html










